M1 Pro 8-Core
VS
Xeon E5-2680 v4

M1 Pro 8-Core vs Xeon E5-2680 v4

M1 Pro 8-Core

8 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 3.22 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2680 v4

14 Cores28 Thrd120 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar M1 Pro 8-Core

#208
M1 Pro 8-Core
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2680 v4

#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
103%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
101%
#124
Xeon E5-2680 v4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
96%
#131
EPYC 74F3
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The M1 Pro 8-Core (2021) utilizes 5 nm technology and LPDDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightM1 Pro 8-CoreXeon E5-2680 v4
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 5 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-EP (2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2680 v4 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightM1 Pro 8-CoreXeon E5-2680 v4
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M1 Pro 8-Core and Xeon E5-2680 v4

M1 Pro 8-Core

The M1 Pro 8-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 18 October 2021 (4 years ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.22 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,218 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon E5-2680 v4

The Xeon E5-2680 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,292 points. Launch price was $1,745.

Processing Power

The M1 Pro 8-Core packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2680 v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2680 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.22 GHz on the M1 Pro 8-Core versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2680 v4 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2680 v4 (base: 2.06 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon E5-2680 v4 is built on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. In PassMark, the M1 Pro 8-Core scores 17,218 against the Xeon E5-2680 v4's 17,292 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2680 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB on the M1 Pro 8-Core vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2680 v4.

FeatureM1 Pro 8-CoreXeon E5-2680 v4
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
14 / 28+75%
Boost Clock
3.22 GHz
3.3 GHz+2%
Base Clock
2.06 GHz
2.4 GHz+17%
L3 Cache
16 MB
35 MB+119%
L2 Cache
28 MB+700%
3.5 MB
Process
5 nm-64%
14 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-EP (2016)
PassMark
17,218
17,292
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M1 Pro 8-Core uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2680 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-6400 on the M1 Pro 8-Core versus 2400 on the Xeon E5-2680 v4 — the Xeon E5-2680 v4 supports 199.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2680 v4 supports up to 1536 of RAM compared to 32 GB 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (M1 Pro 8-Core) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2680 v4) — the Xeon E5-2680 v4 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureM1 Pro 8-CoreXeon E5-2680 v4
Socket
none
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5-6400
2400+47900%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+2184433%
1536
RAM Channels
4
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: Virtualization (M1 Pro 8-Core) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2680 v4). The M1 Pro 8-Core includes integrated graphics (Apple M1 Pro GPU (14-core)), while the Xeon E5-2680 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M1 Pro 8-Core targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Xeon E5-2680 v4 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.

FeatureM1 Pro 8-CoreXeon E5-2680 v4
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Apple M1 Pro GPU (14-core)
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile