
M1 Pro 8-Core

Xeon E-2378
M1 Pro 8-Core vs Xeon E-2378 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
M1 Pro 8-Core vs Xeon E-2378 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
M1 Pro 8-Core vs Xeon E-2378: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
M1 Pro 8-Core
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M1 Pro GPU (14-core), while Xeon E-2378 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2378 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2378, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 20 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon E-2378
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 20 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,069 vs 17,218).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $362 MSRP, while M1 Pro 8-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while M1 Pro 8-Core moves to none and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while M1 Pro 8-Core can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is M1 Pro 8-Core better than Xeon E-2378?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
M1 Pro 8-Core vs Xeon E-2378 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
M1 Pro 8-Core
The M1 Pro 8-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 18 October 2021 (4 years ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.22 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,218 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E-2378
The Xeon E-2378 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 17,069 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The M1 Pro 8-Core packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon E-2378's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.22 GHz on the M1 Pro 8-Core versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2378 — a 39.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2378 (base: 2.06 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon E-2378 is built on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the M1 Pro 8-Core scores 17,218 against the Xeon E-2378's 17,069 — a 0.9% lead for the M1 Pro 8-Core. L3 cache: 16 MB on the M1 Pro 8-Core vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2378.
| Feature | M1 Pro 8-Core | Xeon E-2378 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.22 GHz | 4.8 GHz+49% |
| Base Clock | 2.06 GHz | 2.6 GHz+26% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 28 MB | 512K (per core)+1729% |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | — | Rocket Lake-E (2021) |
| PassMark | 17,218 | 17,069 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,821 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,986 |
Memory & Platform
The M1 Pro 8-Core uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2378 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-6400 on the M1 Pro 8-Core versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon E-2378 — the M1 Pro 8-Core supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E-2378 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (M1 Pro 8-Core) vs 2 (Xeon E-2378). PCIe lanes: 0 (M1 Pro 8-Core) vs 20 (Xeon E-2378) — the Xeon E-2378 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | M1 Pro 8-Core | Xeon E-2378 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-6400+100% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon E-2378 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Virtualization (M1 Pro 8-Core) vs Yes (Xeon E-2378). The M1 Pro 8-Core includes integrated graphics (Apple M1 Pro GPU (14-core)), while the Xeon E-2378 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M1 Pro 8-Core targets Mobile.
| Feature | M1 Pro 8-Core | Xeon E-2378 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Apple M1 Pro GPU (14-core) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Virtualization | Yes |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













