
M1 Pro

Xeon W-1270
M1 Pro vs Xeon W-1270 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
M1 Pro vs Xeon W-1270 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
M1 Pro vs Xeon W-1270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
M1 Pro
2021Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 80W, a 52W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-1270 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,218 vs 17,456).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1270, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon W-1270
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 80W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while M1 Pro moves to none and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-1270 better than M1 Pro?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
M1 Pro vs Xeon W-1270 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
M1 Pro
The M1 Pro is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 18 October 2021 (4 years ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.064 GHz, with boost up to 3.22 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,218 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-1270
The Xeon W-1270 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 17,456 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The M1 Pro packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Xeon W-1270 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the M1 Pro has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.22 GHz on the M1 Pro versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-1270 — a 43.3% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1270 (base: 2.064 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). In PassMark, the M1 Pro scores 17,218 against the Xeon W-1270's 17,456 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon W-1270. L3 cache: 24 MB on the M1 Pro vs 16 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon W-1270.
| Feature | M1 Pro | Xeon W-1270 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.22 GHz | 5 GHz+55% |
| Base Clock | 2.064 GHz | 3.4 GHz+65% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+50% | 16 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 28 MB | — |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| PassMark | 17,218 | 17,456+1% |
Memory & Platform
The M1 Pro uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1270 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | M1 Pro | Xeon W-1270 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













