M1 Pro vs Xeon W-2140B

M1 Pro

10 Cores10 Thrd28 WWMax: 3.22 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Xeon W-2140B

8 Cores16 Thrd120 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2017

M1 Pro vs Xeon W-2140B Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M1 Pro vs Xeon W-2140B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M1 Pro vs Xeon W-2140B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M1 Pro

2021

Why buy it

  • βœ…+118.2% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 11 MB).
  • βœ…Draws 28W instead of 120W, a 92W reduction.
  • βœ…Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2140B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (17,218 vs 17,319).
  • ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2140B, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon W-2140B

2017

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 24 MB).
  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while M1 Pro mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • ❌328.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 28W.
  • ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while M1 Pro moves to none and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2140B better than M1 Pro?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-2140B makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while M1 Pro is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-2140B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2140B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon W-2140B is the better buy right now. Xeon W-2140B comes in at an unclear MSRP at $294 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (58.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
M1 Pro makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017), a healthier platform with none and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, and 118.2% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 11 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

M1 Pro vs Xeon W-2140B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M1 Pro

The M1 Pro is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 18 October 2021 (4 years ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.064 GHz, with boost up to 3.22 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 MBΒ +Β 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,218 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon W-2140B

The Xeon W-2140B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017βˆ’2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 17,319 points. Launch price was $800.

⚑

Processing Power

The M1 Pro packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Xeon W-2140B offers 8 cores / 16 threads β€” the M1 Pro has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.22 GHz on the M1 Pro versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon W-2140B β€” a 26.4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2140B (base: 2.064 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon W-2140B is built on the Skylake (server) (2017βˆ’2018) architecture. In PassMark, the M1 Pro scores 17,218 against the Xeon W-2140B's 17,319 β€” a 0.6% lead for the Xeon W-2140B. L3 cache: 24 MB on the M1 Pro vs 11 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2140B.

FeatureM1 ProXeon W-2140B
Cores / Threads
10 / 10+25%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.22 GHz
4.2 GHz+30%
Base Clock
2.064 GHz
3.2 GHz+55%
L3 Cache
24 MB+118%
11 MB (total)
L2 Cache
28 MB+2700%
1 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm-64%
14 nm
Architecture
β€”
Skylake (server) (2017βˆ’2018)
PassMark
17,218
17,319
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M1 Pro uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2140B uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureM1 ProXeon W-2140B
Socket
none
LGA2066
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0