M1 vs Ryzen 3 7320C

M1 vs Ryzen 3 7320C Performance Spectrum

M1

8 / 8

8,207

+0.2%

Ryzen 3 7320C

4 / 8

8,193

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M1 vs Ryzen 3 7320C FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M1 vs Ryzen 3 7320C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M1

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 7320C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 3 7320C

2023

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while M1 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M1 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,193 vs 8,207).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while M1 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is M1 better than Ryzen 3 7320C?

Yes. M1 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, M1 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M1 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

M1 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. M1 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 7320C only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 10.0% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 7320C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with FT6 and DDR5 instead of the older platform. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

M1 vs Ryzen 3 7320C Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M1

The M1 is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.064 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Passmark benchmark score: 8,207 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen 3 7320C

The Ryzen 3 7320C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FT6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,193 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The M1 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 3 7320C offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the M1 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the M1 versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7320C — a 24.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 7320C (base: 2.064 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 3 7320C is built on the Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the M1 scores 8,207 against the Ryzen 3 7320C's 8,193 — a 0.2% lead for the M1. L3 cache: 16 MB on the M1 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7320C.

Feature	M1	Ryzen 3 7320C
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	4.1 GHz+28%
Base Clock	2.064 GHz	2.4 GHz+16%
L3 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	16 MB+3100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	5 nm-17%	6 nm
Architecture	—	Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023)
PassMark	8,207	8,193
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,163

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (M1) / Yes (Ryzen 3 7320C). The Ryzen 3 7320C includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the M1 requires a dedicated GPU.