M1 vs Xeon D-1712TR

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M1 vs Xeon D-1712TR FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M1 vs Xeon D-1712TR: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M1

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+60% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 10 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon D-1712TR

2022

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M1 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,155 vs 8,207).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 16 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is M1 better than Xeon D-1712TR?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1712TR makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while M1 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, M1 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M1 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 60% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 10 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

M1 still makes the most sense overall. M1 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1712TR makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

M1 vs Xeon D-1712TR Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M1

The M1 is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.064 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Passmark benchmark score: 8,207 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon D-1712TR

The Xeon D-1712TR is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,155 points. Launch price was $263.

⚡

Processing Power

The M1 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon D-1712TR offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the M1 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the M1 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1712TR — a 3.2% clock advantage for the M1 (base: 2.064 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon D-1712TR is built on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the M1 scores 8,207 against the Xeon D-1712TR's 8,155 — a 0.6% lead for the M1. L3 cache: 16 MB on the M1 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon D-1712TR.

Feature	M1	Xeon D-1712TR
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+3%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.064 GHz+3%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB+60%	10 MB (total)
L2 Cache	16 MB+1180%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	—	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark	8,207	8,155