M1 vs Ryzen Embedded V1756B

M1 vs Ryzen Embedded V1756B Performance Spectrum

M1

8 / 8

8,207

+1.2%

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

4 / 8

8,107

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M1 vs Ryzen Embedded V1756B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M1 vs Ryzen Embedded V1756B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M1

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+700% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

2018

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M1 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,107 vs 8,207).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while M1 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is M1 better than Ryzen Embedded V1756B?

Yes. M1 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, M1 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M1 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

M1 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. M1 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Embedded V1756B only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 7.4% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

M1 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018), 700% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

M1 vs Ryzen Embedded V1756B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M1

The M1 is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.064 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Passmark benchmark score: 8,207 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

The Ryzen Embedded V1756B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,107 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The M1 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V1756B offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the M1 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the M1 versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1756B — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V1756B (base: 2.064 GHz vs 3.25 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V1756B is built on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the M1 scores 8,207 against the Ryzen Embedded V1756B's 8,107 — a 1.2% lead for the M1. L3 cache: 16 MB on the M1 vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1756B.

Feature	M1	Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.6 GHz+12%
Base Clock	2.064 GHz	3.25 GHz+57%
L3 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	16 MB	512K (per core)+3100%
Process	5 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	—	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	8,207+1%	8,107