
M2
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
M2
2022Why buy it
- β +1.6% higher PassMark.
- β Draws 20W instead of 65W, a 45W reduction.
- β Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
2017Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (14,699 vs 14,933).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while M2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β225% higher power demand at 65W vs 20W.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while M2 moves to none and DDR5.
M2
2022Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
2017Why buy it
- β +1.6% higher PassMark.
- β Draws 20W instead of 65W, a 45W reduction.
- β Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (14,699 vs 14,933).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while M2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β225% higher power demand at 65W vs 20W.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while M2 moves to none and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is M2 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | M2 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | M2 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 288 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | M2 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 363 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 214 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | M2 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 313 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
M2
M2
The M2 is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 10 June 2022 (3 years ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.48 GHz. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,933 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,699 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The M2 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.48 GHz on the M2 versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 β a 6.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 (base: 2.424 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is built on the Zen (2017β2020) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 scores 14,933 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700's 14,699 β a 1.6% lead for the M2.
| Feature | M2 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.48 GHz | 3.7 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2.424 GHz | 3 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | β | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 20 MB+3900% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | β | Zen (2017β2020) |
| PassMark | 14,933+2% | 14,699 |
Memory & Platform
The M2 uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | M2 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












