M2 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

M2

8 Cores8 Thrd20 WWMax: 3.48 GHz2022

Popular choices:

β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Popular choices:

β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

M2

2022

Why buy it

  • βœ…+1.6% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…Draws 20W instead of 65W, a 45W reduction.
  • βœ…Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

2017

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (14,699 vs 14,933).
  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while M2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • ❌225% higher power demand at 65W vs 20W.
  • ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while M2 moves to none and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is M2 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is ahead with a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, M2 pulls ahead with 1.6% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M2 is the better fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
M2 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. M2 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you 1.6% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (44.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
M2 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017), a healthier platform with none and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetM2Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
1080p
low175 FPS176 FPS
medium140 FPS154 FPS
high113 FPS127 FPS
ultra90 FPS104 FPS
1440p
low141 FPS145 FPS
medium111 FPS121 FPS
high88 FPS97 FPS
ultra69 FPS78 FPS
4K
low66 FPS66 FPS
medium55 FPS59 FPS
high44 FPS47 FPS
ultra35 FPS37 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetM2Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
1080p
low288 FPS286 FPS
medium246 FPS253 FPS
high213 FPS226 FPS
ultra166 FPS186 FPS
1440p
low248 FPS253 FPS
medium220 FPS229 FPS
high193 FPS203 FPS
ultra150 FPS167 FPS
4K
low174 FPS183 FPS
medium159 FPS170 FPS
high136 FPS156 FPS
ultra106 FPS124 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetM2Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
1080p
low373 FPS367 FPS
medium373 FPS367 FPS
high373 FPS367 FPS
ultra373 FPS367 FPS
1440p
low373 FPS367 FPS
medium373 FPS367 FPS
high373 FPS367 FPS
ultra363 FPS319 FPS
4K
low373 FPS363 FPS
medium314 FPS295 FPS
high277 FPS264 FPS
ultra221 FPS214 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetM2Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
1080p
low373 FPS367 FPS
medium373 FPS367 FPS
high373 FPS367 FPS
ultra373 FPS367 FPS
1440p
low373 FPS367 FPS
medium373 FPS367 FPS
high373 FPS367 FPS
ultra373 FPS367 FPS
4K
low373 FPS367 FPS
medium373 FPS367 FPS
high373 FPS363 FPS
ultra328 FPS313 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

M2

The M2 is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 10 June 2022 (3 years ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.48 GHz. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,933 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017βˆ’2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,699 points. Launch price was $149.

⚑

Processing Power

The M2 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.48 GHz on the M2 versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 β€” a 6.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 (base: 2.424 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is built on the Zen (2017βˆ’2020) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 scores 14,933 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700's 14,699 β€” a 1.6% lead for the M2.

FeatureM2Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.48 GHz
3.7 GHz+6%
Base Clock
2.424 GHz
3 GHz+24%
L3 Cache
β€”
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
20 MB+3900%
512K (per core)
Process
5 nm-64%
14 nm
Architecture
β€”
Zen (2017βˆ’2020)
PassMark
14,933+2%
14,699
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M2 uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureM2Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Socket
none
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0