M2 vs Xeon Silver 4116T

M2

8 Cores8 Thrd20 WWMax: 3.48 GHz2022
VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4116T

12 Cores24 Thrd85 WWMax: 3 GHz2017

M2 vs Xeon Silver 4116T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M2 vs Xeon Silver 4116T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M2 vs Xeon Silver 4116T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M2

2022

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…Draws 20W instead of 85W, a 65W reduction.
  • βœ…Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (14,933 vs 15,187).
  • ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4116T, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Xeon Silver 4116T

2017

Why buy it

  • βœ…+1.7% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌325% higher power demand at 85W vs 20W.
  • ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while M2 moves to none and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is M2 better than Xeon Silver 4116T?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Silver 4116T makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while M2 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4116T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
M2 still makes the most sense overall. M2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
M2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with none and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

M2 vs Xeon Silver 4116T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M2

The M2 is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 10 June 2022 (3 years ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.48 GHz. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,933 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4116T

The Xeon Silver 4116T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017βˆ’2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 15,187 points. Launch price was $800.

⚑

Processing Power

The M2 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4116T offers 12 cores / 24 threads β€” the Xeon Silver 4116T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.48 GHz on the M2 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4116T β€” a 14.8% clock advantage for the M2 (base: 2.424 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Silver 4116T is built on the Skylake (server) (2017βˆ’2018) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 scores 14,933 against the Xeon Silver 4116T's 15,187 β€” a 1.7% lead for the Xeon Silver 4116T.

FeatureM2Xeon Silver 4116T
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock
3.48 GHz+16%
3 GHz
Base Clock
2.424 GHz+15%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
β€”
16.5 MB
L2 Cache
20 MB+67%
12 MB
Process
5 nm-64%
14 nm
Architecture
β€”
Skylake (server) (2017βˆ’2018)
PassMark
14,933
15,187+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M2 uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4116T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureM2Xeon Silver 4116T
Socket
none
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0