M2 vs Xeon E5-4610 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M2 vs Xeon E5-4610 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M2 vs Xeon E5-4610 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M2

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 20W instead of 105W, a 85W reduction.
✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,933 vs 15,084).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4610 v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon E5-4610 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌425% higher power demand at 105W vs 20W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while M2 moves to none and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is M2 better than Xeon E5-4610 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4610 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while M2 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4610 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

M2 still makes the most sense overall. M2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

M2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with none and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

M2 vs Xeon E5-4610 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M2

The M2 is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 10 June 2022 (3 years ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.48 GHz. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,933 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-4610 v4

The Xeon E5-4610 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,084 points. Launch price was $1,219.

⚡

Processing Power

The M2 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4610 v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-4610 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.48 GHz on the M2 versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4610 v4 — a 63.6% clock advantage for the M2 (base: 2.424 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-4610 v4 is built on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 scores 14,933 against the Xeon E5-4610 v4's 15,084 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-4610 v4.

Feature	M2	Xeon E5-4610 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	3.48 GHz+93%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.424 GHz+35%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	25 MB
L2 Cache	20 MB+700%	2.5 MB
Process	5 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	—	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	14,933	15,084+1%