CPU
GPU
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Athlon 64 3500+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ is positioned at rank 1055 and the Athlon 64 3500+ is on rank 1102, so the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3500+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ | Athlon 64 3500+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / Standard Node) | 🛑 Legacy (San Diego (2001−2005) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ | Athlon 64 3500+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Athlon 64 3500+
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
The Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.
Athlon 64 3500+
The Athlon 64 3500+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 570 points. Launch price was $59.
Processing Power
Both the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Athlon 64 3500+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ versus 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3500+ — identical boost frequencies. The Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture, while the Athlon 64 3500+ uses San Diego (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ scores 545 against the Athlon 64 3500+'s 570 — a 4.5% lead for the Athlon 64 3500+.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ | Athlon 64 3500+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | — | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Clawhammer (2001−2005) | San Diego (2001−2005) |
| PassMark | 545 | 570+5% |
Memory & Platform
The Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon 64 3500+ uses 939 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ versus DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 3500+ — the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ supports 100+% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 3500+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Mobile Athlon 64 3400+) vs 2 (Athlon 64 3500+). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 3400+) and AMD 939 (Athlon 64 3500+).
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ | Athlon 64 3500+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | 939 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 400 | DDR-400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 | 4 GB+209715100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3400+) / not specified (Athlon 64 3500+). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ rivals Pentium M 735.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ | Athlon 64 3500+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | false | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Athlon 64 3500+
