Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ vs Turion 64 ML-37

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ vs Turion 64 ML-37 Performance Spectrum

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

1 / 1

545

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion 64 ML-37

1 / 1

555

+1.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ vs Turion 64 ML-37 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ vs Turion 64 ML-37: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (545 vs 555).

Turion 64 ML-37

2005

Why buy it

✅+1.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion 64 ML-37 better than Mobile Athlon 64 3400+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 ML-37 pulls ahead with 1.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 ML-37 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion 64 ML-37 still makes the most sense overall. Turion 64 ML-37 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.8% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion 64 ML-37 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ vs Turion 64 ML-37 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

The Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

Turion 64 ML-37

The Turion 64 ML-37 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 555 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Turion 64 ML-37 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ versus 2 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-37 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+. The Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture, while the Turion 64 ML-37 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ scores 545 against the Turion 64 ML-37's 555 — a 1.8% lead for the Turion 64 ML-37.

Feature	Mobile Athlon 64 3400+	Turion 64 ML-37
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+10%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	—	90 nm
Architecture	Clawhammer (2001−2005)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	545	555+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the 754 socket with PCIe 1.1.

Feature	Mobile Athlon 64 3400+	Turion 64 ML-37
Socket	754	754
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	400	—
Max RAM Capacity	2	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3400+) / not specified (Turion 64 ML-37). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ rivals Pentium M 735.