Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ vs Pentium M 780

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ vs Pentium M 780 Performance Spectrum

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

1 / 1

545

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium M 780

1 / 1

575

+5.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ vs Pentium M 780 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ vs Pentium M 780: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

2005

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 27W, a 26W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (545 vs 575).

Pentium M 780

2005

Why buy it

✅+5.5% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌2600% higher power demand at 27W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 780 better than Mobile Athlon 64 3400+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 780 pulls ahead with 5.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 780 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 780 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 780 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 5.5% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium M 780 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ vs Pentium M 780 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

The Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium M 780

The Pentium M 780 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 575 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Pentium M 780 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ versus 0.03 GHz on the Pentium M 780 — a 194.6% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+. The Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture, while the Pentium M 780 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ scores 545 against the Pentium M 780's 575 — a 5.4% lead for the Pentium M 780.

Feature	Mobile Athlon 64 3400+	Pentium M 780
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+7233%	0.03 GHz
Base Clock	—	2.26 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	—	90 nm
Architecture	Clawhammer (2001−2005)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	545	575+6%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 780 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 780 — the Pentium M 780 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium M 780 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Mobile Athlon 64 3400+) vs 2 (Pentium M 780). PCIe lanes: 0 (Mobile Athlon 64 3400+) vs 16 (Pentium M 780) — the Pentium M 780 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 3400+) and 915GM,945GT (Pentium M 780).

Feature	Mobile Athlon 64 3400+	Pentium M 780
Socket	754	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	400	DDR2-533+33%
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16