Celeron 807 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Celeron 807
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 807 is positioned at rank 1141 and the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ is on rank 1055, so the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 807
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 807 | Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / Standard Node) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 807 | Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 807 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Celeron 807
The Celeron 807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $70.
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
The Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron 807 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 807 versus 2.2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+. The Celeron 807 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ uses Clawhammer (2001−2005). In PassMark, the Celeron 807 scores 535 against the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+'s 545 — a 1.9% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+.
| Feature | Celeron 807 | Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 2 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz+47% |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 1.5 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 32 nm | — |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Clawhammer (2001−2005) |
| PassMark | 535 | 545+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 807 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 807 versus 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ — the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ supports 197% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 807 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 2 — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron 807) vs 1 (Mobile Athlon 64 3400+). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: QM67,QS67,HM67,HM65 (Celeron 807) and 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 3400+).
| Feature | Celeron 807 | Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | 400+13233% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+838860700% | 2 |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 807) vs false (Mobile Athlon 64 3400+). The Celeron 807 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 807 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ rivals Pentium M 735.
| Feature | Celeron 807 | Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | false |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 807 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
