Celeron 807 vs Pentium M 770

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 807 vs Pentium M 770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 807 vs Pentium M 770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 807

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 27W, a 10W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium M 770 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium M 770 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (535 vs 545).
❌Launch MSRP is still $70 MSRP, while Pentium M 770 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium M 770

2005

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌58.8% higher power demand at 27W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 807 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 770 better than Celeron 807?

Yes. Pentium M 770 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium M 770 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 770 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 770 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Pentium M 770 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $70 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron 807 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 8.8% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 807 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 807 vs Pentium M 770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 807

The Celeron 807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $70.

Pentium M 770

The Pentium M 770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.01 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 807 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Pentium M 770's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 807 versus 0.01 GHz on the Pentium M 770 — a 197.4% clock advantage for the Celeron 807 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Celeron 807 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium M 770 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 807 scores 535 against the Pentium M 770's 545 — a 1.9% lead for the Pentium M 770. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron 807 vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 770.

Feature	Celeron 807	Pentium M 770
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz+14900%	0.01 GHz
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2.13 GHz+42%
L3 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	32 nm-64%	90 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	535	545+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 807 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 770 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 807	Pentium M 770
Socket	BGA1023	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 807) / not specified (Pentium M 770). The Celeron 807 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium M 770 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 807 targets Mobile.