Celeron 807 vs Turion 64 MT-37

CPU

GPU

Celeron 807

1 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2012

Turion 64 MT-37

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron 807

1 / 2

535

0.0%

555

+3.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 807 is positioned at rank 1141 and the Turion 64 MT-37 is on rank 913, so the Turion 64 MT-37 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 807

#1129

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

3840%

#1130

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

3784%

#1131

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

3474%

#1132

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

3458%

#1133

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

3426%

#1135

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

3309%

#1136

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

3173%

#1137

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

3168%

#1138

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

3082%

#1141

Celeron 807

MSRP: $70|Avg: $10

100%

#1142

Pentium B950

MSRP: $134|Avg: $35

100%

#1143

Celeron 220

MSRP: $42|Avg: $42

100%

#1144

Pentium B960

MSRP: $134|Avg: $15

99%

#1146

Pentium 957

MSRP: $134|Avg: $10

99%

#1147

Core 2 Duo SL9400

MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A

99%

#1149

Pentium N3540

MSRP: $161|Avg: $161

98%

#1150

Core i7-3555LE

MSRP: $300|Avg: $280

98%

#1151

Core i3-2377M

MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A

97%

#1152

Core 2 Duo E8435

MSRP: $150|Avg: $74

96%

#1153

Celeron M 723

MSRP: $161|Avg: $161

96%

#1154

Core i7-3517UE

MSRP: $330|Avg: $35

95%

#1155

Core M-5Y51

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

95%

#1156

Pentium N3530

MSRP: $161|Avg: $20

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 MT-37

#900

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1586%

#901

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1563%

#902

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1435%

#903

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1428%

#904

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1415%

#906

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1366%

#907

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1310%

#908

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1308%

#909

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1273%

#913

Turion 64 MT-37

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#918

Core i5-8365UE

MSRP: $297|Avg: $297

99%

#920

A6 Pro-7050B

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

98%

#922

Athlon II N370

MSRP: $60|Avg: $10

98%

#927

A8-6410

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

96%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 807 (2012) utilizes 32 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Celeron 807	Turion 64 MT-37
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($10)	✅ More affordable ($0)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Turion 64 MT-37 (2005) relies on 90 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Celeron 807	Turion 64 MT-37
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($10)	✅ More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron 807 Benchmark Check

Turion 64 MT-37 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 807 and Turion 64 MT-37

Celeron 807

The Celeron 807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $70.

Turion 64 MT-37

The Turion 64 MT-37 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 555 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 807 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Turion 64 MT-37's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 807 versus 2 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-37 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Turion 64 MT-37. The Celeron 807 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Turion 64 MT-37 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 807 scores 535 against the Turion 64 MT-37's 555 — a 3.7% lead for the Turion 64 MT-37. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron 807 vs 0 kB on the Turion 64 MT-37.

Feature	Celeron 807	Turion 64 MT-37
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	2 GHz+33%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB+300%
Process	32 nm-64%	90 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	535	555+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 807 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 MT-37 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 807	Turion 64 MT-37
Socket	BGA1023	754
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	❌	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 807) / not specified (Turion 64 MT-37). The Celeron 807 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Turion 64 MT-37 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 807 targets Mobile.