Celeron 807 vs Celeron SU2300
Celeron 807
Celeron SU2300
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 807 is positioned at rank 1141 and the Celeron SU2300 is on rank 1223, so the Celeron 807 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 807
Performance Per Dollar Celeron SU2300
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 807 | Celeron SU2300 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($134) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 807 | Celeron SU2300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1215%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($134) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 807 and Celeron SU2300
Celeron 807
The Celeron 807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $70.
Celeron SU2300
The Celeron SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron 807 is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 807 scores 535 against the Celeron SU2300's 545 — a 1.9% lead for the Celeron SU2300. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron 807 vs 1 MB on the Celeron SU2300.
| Feature | Celeron 807 | Celeron SU2300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 1.5 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz+25% | 1.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 1.5 MB (total)+50% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | — |
| PassMark | 535 | 545+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 807 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron SU2300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron 807 | Celeron SU2300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | BGA956 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 807) / not specified (Celeron SU2300). The Celeron 807 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Celeron SU2300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 807 targets Mobile.
| Feature | Celeron 807 | Celeron SU2300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron 807 launched at $70 MSRP, while the Celeron SU2300 debuted at $134. At current prices ($10 vs $134), the Celeron 807 is $124 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 807 delivers 53.5 pts/$ vs 4.1 pts/$ for the Celeron SU2300 — making the Celeron 807 the 171.7% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 807 | Celeron SU2300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70-48% | $134 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-93% | $134 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5+1205% | 4.1 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 807 and Celeron SU2300
