Atom E3826 vs Celeron 807

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom E3826 vs Celeron 807 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom E3826 vs Celeron 807: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom E3826

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 7W instead of 17W, a 10W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron 807

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom E3826 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (535 vs 545).
❌Launch MSRP is still $70 MSRP, while Atom E3826 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌142.9% higher power demand at 17W vs 7W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom E3826 better than Celeron 807?

Yes. Atom E3826 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom E3826 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom E3826 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom E3826 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Atom E3826 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $70 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron 807 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 8.8% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom E3826 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom E3826 vs Celeron 807 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom E3826

The Atom E3826 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.47 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron 807

The Celeron 807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $70.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom E3826 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron 807 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the Atom E3826 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.47 GHz on the Atom E3826 versus 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 807 — a 2% clock advantage for the Celeron 807. The Atom E3826 uses the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron 807 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E3826 scores 545 against the Celeron 807's 535 — a 1.9% lead for the Atom E3826. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom E3826 vs 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron 807.

Feature	Atom E3826	Celeron 807
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 2
Boost Clock	1.47 GHz	1.5 GHz+2%
Base Clock	—	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-I (2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	545+2%	535

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom E3826 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 807 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1066 on the Atom E3826 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 807 — the Celeron 807 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 807 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom E3826) vs 0 (Celeron 807) — the Atom E3826 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1170 (Atom E3826) and QM67,QS67,HM67,HM65 (Celeron 807).

Feature	Atom E3826	Celeron 807
Socket	FCBGA1170	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1066	DDR3-1333+25%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom E3826) / VT-x (Celeron 807). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Atom E3826) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron 807) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 807 targets Mobile.

Feature	Atom E3826	Celeron 807
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x
Target Use	—	Mobile