Atom E3826 vs Turion 64 ML-37

Atom E3826 vs Turion 64 ML-37 Performance Spectrum

Atom E3826

2 / 2

545

0.0%

555

+1.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom E3826 vs Turion 64 ML-37 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom E3826 vs Turion 64 ML-37: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom E3826

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Turion 64 ML-37 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (545 vs 555).
❌600% higher power demand at 7W vs 1W.

Turion 64 ML-37

2005

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 7W, a 6W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Atom E3826 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion 64 ML-37 better than Atom E3826?

Yes. Turion 64 ML-37 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 1.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion 64 ML-37 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 36.1% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 ML-37 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion 64 ML-37 still makes the most sense overall. Turion 64 ML-37 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.8% higher PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom E3826 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom E3826 vs Turion 64 ML-37 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom E3826

The Atom E3826 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.47 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

Turion 64 ML-37

The Turion 64 ML-37 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 555 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom E3826 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Turion 64 ML-37 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Atom E3826 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.47 GHz on the Atom E3826 versus 2 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-37 — a 30.5% clock advantage for the Turion 64 ML-37. The Atom E3826 uses the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-37 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E3826 scores 545 against the Turion 64 ML-37's 555 — a 1.8% lead for the Turion 64 ML-37. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom E3826	Turion 64 ML-37
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.47 GHz	2 GHz+36%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB+100%
Process	22 nm-76%	90 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-I (2013)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	545	555+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom E3826 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 ML-37 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.