Atom E3826 vs Opteron 148

Atom E3826 vs Opteron 148 Performance Spectrum

Atom E3826

2 / 2

545

0.0%

548

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom E3826 vs Opteron 148 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom E3826 vs Opteron 148: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom E3826

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 85W, a 78W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Opteron 148 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (545 vs 548).

Opteron 148

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌1114.3% higher power demand at 85W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom E3826 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 148 better than Atom E3826?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 148 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Atom E3826 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 148 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 49.7% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 148 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 148 still makes the most sense overall. Opteron 148 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% higher PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom E3826 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom E3826 vs Opteron 148 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom E3826

The Atom E3826 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.47 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

Opteron 148

The Opteron 148 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 548 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom E3826 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Opteron 148 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Atom E3826 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.47 GHz on the Atom E3826 versus 2.2 GHz on the Opteron 148 — a 39.8% clock advantage for the Opteron 148. The Atom E3826 uses the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 148 uses SledgeHammer (2003−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E3826 scores 545 against the Opteron 148's 548 — a 0.5% lead for the Opteron 148. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom E3826	Opteron 148
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.47 GHz	2.2 GHz+50%
Base Clock	—	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB+100%
Process	22 nm-83%	130 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-I (2013)	SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
PassMark	545	548

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom E3826 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron 148 uses 939 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.