Celeron 807 vs Sempron 3800+
Celeron 807
Sempron 3800+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 807 is positioned at rank 1141 and the Sempron 3800+ is on rank 853, so the Sempron 3800+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 807
Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3800+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 807 | Sempron 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Manila (2001−2006) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 807 | Sempron 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 807 and Sempron 3800+
Celeron 807
The Celeron 807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $70.
Sempron 3800+
The Sempron 3800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 528 points. Launch price was $21.
Processing Power
The Celeron 807 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Sempron 3800+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 807 versus 2.2 GHz on the Sempron 3800+ — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Sempron 3800+. The Celeron 807 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Sempron 3800+ uses Manila (2001−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 807 scores 535 against the Sempron 3800+'s 528 — a 1.3% lead for the Celeron 807. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron 807 vs 0 kB on the Sempron 3800+.
| Feature | Celeron 807 | Sempron 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 2 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz+47% |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 1.5 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB |
| Process | 32 nm-64% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Manila (2001−2006) |
| PassMark | 535+1% | 528 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 807 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 3800+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron 807 | Sempron 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 807) / not specified (Sempron 3800+). The Celeron 807 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Sempron 3800+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 807 targets Mobile.
| Feature | Celeron 807 | Sempron 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 807 and Sempron 3800+
