Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 vs Sempron 3200+

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

1 Cores2 Thrd66 WWMax: 2.67 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Sempron 3200+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 vs Sempron 3200+ Performance Spectrum

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
1 / 2
395
+1.0%
brand logoAtom Z520
brand logoAtom Z530
brand logoCeleron 2.20
brand logoPentium M 1.40
brand logoCore i7-12700TE
brand logoXeon W-3335
brand logoXeon w7-3545
brand logoXeon w9-3575X
Sempron 3200+
1 / 1
391
0.0%
brand logoAthlon XP 1700+
brand logoAthlon XP 2000+
brand logoAthlon XP 2200+
brand logoAthlon XP 2600+
brand logoRyzen 5 PRO 5655G
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 vs Sempron 3200+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3200+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3200+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3200+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3200+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3200+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3200+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3200+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3200+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3200+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3200+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 vs Sempron 3200+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

2003

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Sempron 3200+

    2005

    Why buy it

    • ✅Draws 62W instead of 66W, a 4W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (391 vs 395).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 better than Sempron 3200+?
    Yes. Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 still makes the most sense overall. Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Sempron 3200+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 vs Sempron 3200+ Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

    The Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 66 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 395 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Sempron 3200+

    The Sempron 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 391 points. Launch price was $13.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    The Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Sempron 3200+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 versus 1.8 GHz on the Sempron 3200+ — a 38.9% clock advantage for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66. The Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron 3200+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 scores 395 against the Sempron 3200+'s 391 — a 1% lead for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureMobile Pentium 4 2.66Sempron 3200+
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 2
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2.67 GHz+48%
    1.8 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB+100%
    256 kB
    Process
    130 nm
    90 nm-31%
    Architecture
    Northwood (2002−2004)
    Palermo (2001−2005)
    PassMark
    395+1%
    391
    Geekbench 6 Single
    800
    —
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    800
    —
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3200+ uses 939 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureMobile Pentium 4 2.66Sempron 3200+
    Socket
    PGA478
    939
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR2
    —
    Max RAM Capacity
    4 GB
    —
    RAM Channels
    1
    —
    ECC Support
    No
    —
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    —
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: None (Mobile Pentium 4 2.66) / not specified (Sempron 3200+). Primary use case: Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 targets Legacy Laptop.

    FeatureMobile Pentium 4 2.66Sempron 3200+
    Integrated GPU
    No
    —
    IGPU Model
    None
    —
    Unlocked
    No
    —
    AVX-512
    No
    —
    Virtualization
    None
    —
    Target Use
    Legacy Laptop
    —