Core Solo T1350 vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Solo T1350 vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Solo T1350 vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.66: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Solo T1350

2006

Why buy it

✅+2.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 66W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

2003

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (395 vs 405).
❌3200% higher power demand at 66W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Solo T1350 better than Mobile Pentium 4 2.66?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core Solo T1350 pulls ahead with 2.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Solo T1350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Solo T1350 is the better buy right now. Core Solo T1350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $200 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 2.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (2.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Solo T1350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core Solo T1350 vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Solo T1350

The Core Solo T1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $249.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

The Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 66 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 395 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Solo T1350 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Core Solo T1350 versus 2.67 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 — a 35.8% clock advantage for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66. The Core Solo T1350 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Core Solo T1350 scores 405 against the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66's 395 — a 2.5% lead for the Core Solo T1350. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core Solo T1350	Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 2
Boost Clock	1.86 GHz	2.67 GHz+44%
Base Clock	1.86 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB
Process	65 nm-50%	130 nm
Architecture	Yonah (2005−2006)	Northwood (2002−2004)
PassMark	405+3%	395
Geekbench 6 Single	—	800
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	800

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1.

Feature	Core Solo T1350	Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
Socket	PGA478	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR2
Max RAM Capacity	—	4 GB
RAM Channels	—	1
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core Solo T1350) / None (Mobile Pentium 4 2.66). Primary use case: Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 targets Legacy Laptop.