Core Solo T1350
VS
Sempron 3200+

Core Solo T1350 vs Sempron 3200+

Intel

Core Solo T1350

1 Cores1 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2006
VS
AMD

Sempron 3200+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core Solo T1350 is positioned at rank 1238 and the Sempron 3200+ is on rank 943, so the Sempron 3200+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Solo T1350

#1226
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
14453%
#1227
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
14241%
#1228
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
13074%
#1229
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
13015%
#1230
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
12896%
#1232
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
12453%
#1233
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
11941%
#1234
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
11921%
#1235
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
11601%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
100%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
91%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3200+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
23923%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
22605%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
16413%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4945%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3917%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3426%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1962%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1937%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1763%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1763%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1744%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1697%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1673%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1666%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1651%
#943
Sempron 3200+
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#944
Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $175
100%
#946
Core i5-650
MSRP: $176|Avg: $22
98%
#947
Phenom X3 8600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#948
A10-6790B
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
97%
#949
Core i3-6100TE
MSRP: $250|Avg: $90
97%
#950
FX-4320
MSRP: $250|Avg: $100
97%
#951
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $150
97%
#952
Celeron E1200
MSRP: $53|Avg: $98
96%
#954
Core i5-660
MSRP: $196|Avg: $150
95%
#955
Athlon II X2 250
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
95%
#956
Core i3-2120T
MSRP: $127|Avg: $38
95%
#957
Phenom II X3 720
MSRP: $130|Avg: $64
94%
#958
Pentium E6300
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core Solo T1350 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Sempron 3200+ in both compute-intensive tasks (3.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore Solo T1350Sempron 3200+
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Solo T1350Sempron 3200+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)
More affordable ($0)

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Solo T1350 and Sempron 3200+

Intel

Core Solo T1350

The Core Solo T1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Sempron 3200+

The Sempron 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 391 points. Launch price was $13.

Processing Power

Both the Core Solo T1350 and Sempron 3200+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Core Solo T1350 versus 1.8 GHz on the Sempron 3200+ — a 3.3% clock advantage for the Core Solo T1350. The Core Solo T1350 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron 3200+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core Solo T1350 scores 405 against the Sempron 3200+'s 391 — a 3.5% lead for the Core Solo T1350. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCore Solo T1350Sempron 3200+
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.86 GHz+3%
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256 kB
Process
65 nm-28%
90 nm
Architecture
Yonah (2005−2006)
Palermo (2001−2005)
PassMark
405+4%
391
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Solo T1350 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3200+ uses 939 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Solo T1350Sempron 3200+
Socket
PGA478
939
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%