Core Solo T1350 vs Pentium 4 2.80

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Solo T1350 vs Pentium 4 2.80 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Solo T1350 vs Pentium 4 2.80: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Solo T1350

2006

Why buy it

✅Costs $127 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $327 MSRP).
✅Delivers 62.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 1.2 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $327 MSRP).
✅Draws 2W instead of 110W, a 108W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (405 vs 408).

Pentium 4 2.80

2002

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 2.0 PassMark/$ ($327 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
❌5400% higher power demand at 110W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium 4 2.80 better than Core Solo T1350?

Yes. Pentium 4 2.80 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 45 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium 4 2.80 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 45 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 4 2.80 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium 4 2.80 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium 4 2.80 comes in 63.5% more expensive on MSRP at $327 MSRP versus $200 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 45 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core Solo T1350 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2006 platform. Even with 62.3% better value on paper (2.0 vs 1.2 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Solo T1350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2002). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core Solo T1350 vs Pentium 4 2.80 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Solo T1350

The Core Solo T1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $249.

Pentium 4 2.80

The Pentium 4 2.80 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.79 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core Solo T1350 and Pentium 4 2.80 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Core Solo T1350 versus 2.79 GHz on the Pentium 4 2.80 — a 40% clock advantage for the Pentium 4 2.80. The Core Solo T1350 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium 4 2.80 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Core Solo T1350 scores 405 against the Pentium 4 2.80's 408 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium 4 2.80. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core Solo T1350	Pentium 4 2.80
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.86 GHz	2.79 GHz+50%
Base Clock	1.86 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB
Process	65 nm-50%	130 nm
Architecture	Yonah (2005−2006)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	405	408

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1.

Feature	Core Solo T1350	Pentium 4 2.80
Socket	PGA478	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core Solo T1350 was priced at $200, while the Pentium 4 2.80 came in at $327. On launch pricing ($200 vs $327), Core Solo T1350 was $127 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Solo T1350 delivers 2.0 pts/$ vs 1.2 pts/$ for the Pentium 4 2.80 — making the Core Solo T1350 the 47.5% better value option.

Feature	Core Solo T1350	Pentium 4 2.80
MSRP	$200-39%	$327
Performance per Dollar	2.0+67%	1.2
Release Date	2006	2002

Search Core Solo T1350 on Amazon

Search Pentium 4 2.80 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.