Core Solo T1350 vs Sempron LE-1150

Intel

Core Solo T1350

1 Cores1 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2006
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Sempron LE-1150

1 Cores1 Thrd45 WWMax: 2 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······

Core Solo T1350 vs Sempron LE-1150 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Solo T1350 vs Sempron LE-1150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Solo T1350 vs Sempron LE-1150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Solo T1350

2006

Why buy it

  • +3.8% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Sempron LE-1150 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Sempron LE-1150

2007

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (390 vs 405).
    • 2150% higher power demand at 45W vs 2W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core Solo T1350 better than Sempron LE-1150?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Sempron LE-1150 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core Solo T1350 pulls ahead with 3.8% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Solo T1350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core Solo T1350 is the better buy right now. Core Solo T1350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $200 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 3.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Sempron LE-1150 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (2.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Sempron LE-1150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Core Solo T1350 vs Sempron LE-1150 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core Solo T1350

    The Core Solo T1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $249.

    AMD

    Sempron LE-1150

    The Sempron LE-1150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sparta (2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 390 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Core Solo T1350 and Sempron LE-1150 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Core Solo T1350 versus 2 GHz on the Sempron LE-1150 — a 7.3% clock advantage for the Sempron LE-1150. The Core Solo T1350 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron LE-1150 uses Sparta (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core Solo T1350 scores 405 against the Sempron LE-1150's 390 — a 3.8% lead for the Core Solo T1350. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureCore Solo T1350Sempron LE-1150
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.86 GHz
    2 GHz+8%
    Base Clock
    1.86 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    2 MB+700%
    256 kB
    Process
    65 nm
    65 nm
    Architecture
    Yonah (2005−2006)
    Sparta (2007)
    PassMark
    405+4%
    390
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core Solo T1350 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron LE-1150 uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore Solo T1350Sempron LE-1150
    Socket
    PGA478
    AM2
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%