Core Solo T1350 vs Sempron 3300+

Core Solo T1350 vs Sempron 3300+ Performance Spectrum

Core Solo T1350

1 / 1

405

0.0%

412

+1.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Solo T1350 vs Sempron 3300+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Solo T1350 vs Sempron 3300+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Solo T1350

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 62W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (405 vs 412).
❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Sempron 3300+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Sempron 3300+

2001

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌3000% higher power demand at 62W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron 3300+ better than Core Solo T1350?

Yes. Sempron 3300+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Sempron 3300+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 3300+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Sempron 3300+ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Sempron 3300+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $200 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core Solo T1350 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2006 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (2.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Solo T1350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2001). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core Solo T1350 vs Sempron 3300+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Solo T1350

The Core Solo T1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $249.

Sempron 3300+

The Sempron 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 412 points. Launch price was $30.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core Solo T1350 and Sempron 3300+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Core Solo T1350 versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 3300+ — a 7.3% clock advantage for the Sempron 3300+. The Core Solo T1350 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron 3300+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Core Solo T1350 scores 405 against the Sempron 3300+'s 412 — a 1.7% lead for the Sempron 3300+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core Solo T1350	Sempron 3300+
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.86 GHz	2 GHz+8%
Base Clock	1.86 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB	512K+25500%
Process	65 nm-50%	130 nm
Architecture	Yonah (2005−2006)	Palermo (2001−2005)
PassMark	405	412+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Solo T1350 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3300+ uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.