Core Solo T1350
VS
Sempron 3300+

Core Solo T1350 vs Sempron 3300+

Intel

Core Solo T1350

1 Cores1 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2006
VS
AMD

Sempron 3300+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 2 GHz2001

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core Solo T1350 is positioned at rank 1238 and the Sempron 3300+ is on rank 923, so the Sempron 3300+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Solo T1350

#1226
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
14453%
#1227
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
14241%
#1228
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
13074%
#1229
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
13015%
#1230
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
12896%
#1232
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
12453%
#1233
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
11941%
#1234
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
11921%
#1235
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
11601%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
100%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
91%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3300+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
22703%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
21452%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
15576%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4692%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3717%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3252%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1862%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1838%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1674%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1673%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1655%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1610%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1588%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1581%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1567%
#302
Core i7-6900K
MSRP: $1089|Avg: $1089
98%
#303
Core i7-5960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $83
98%
#922
Athlon II X4 605e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $25
100%
#923
Sempron 3300+
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#924
Athlon II X4 610e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $20
100%
#925
Core i5-2390T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $182
100%
#926
Phenom II X4 910e
MSRP: $157|Avg: $69
100%
#927
FX-8100
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
99%
#929
Celeron E1400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $63
98%
#931
Pentium E6800
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
#932
Core i3-530
MSRP: $113|Avg: $15
98%
#934
Core i3-2105
MSRP: $138|Avg: $30
97%
#935
Athlon II X3 405e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#936
Core i3-3225
MSRP: $172|Avg: $167
96%
#937
Athlon II X3 400e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Sempron 3300+ delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core Solo T1350 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore Solo T1350Sempron 3300+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Solo T1350Sempron 3300+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Solo T1350 and Sempron 3300+

Intel

Core Solo T1350

The Core Solo T1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Sempron 3300+

The Sempron 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 412 points. Launch price was $30.

Processing Power

Both the Core Solo T1350 and Sempron 3300+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Core Solo T1350 versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 3300+ — a 7.3% clock advantage for the Sempron 3300+. The Core Solo T1350 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron 3300+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Core Solo T1350 scores 405 against the Sempron 3300+'s 412 — a 1.7% lead for the Sempron 3300+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCore Solo T1350Sempron 3300+
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.86 GHz
2 GHz+8%
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512K
Process
65 nm-50%
130 nm
Architecture
Yonah (2005−2006)
Palermo (2001−2005)
PassMark
405
412+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Solo T1350 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3300+ uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Solo T1350Sempron 3300+
Socket
PGA478
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%