Core Solo T1350 vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

Core Solo T1350 vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ Performance Spectrum

Core Solo T1350

1 / 1

405

0.0%

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

1 / 1

420

+3.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Solo T1350 vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Solo T1350 vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Solo T1350

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (405 vs 420).
❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

2004

Why buy it

✅+3.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Solo T1350 better than Mobile Athlon 64 2800+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core Solo T1350 is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ pulls ahead with 3.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Solo T1350 is the better buy right now. Core Solo T1350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $200 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 3.7% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (2.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Solo T1350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core Solo T1350 vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Solo T1350

The Core Solo T1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $249.

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core Solo T1350 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Core Solo T1350 versus 1.8 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ — a 3.3% clock advantage for the Core Solo T1350. The Core Solo T1350 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses Oakville (2003−2004). In PassMark, the Core Solo T1350 scores 405 against the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+'s 420 — a 3.6% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+.

Feature	Core Solo T1350	Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.86 GHz+3%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.86 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	2 MB	512K+25500%
Process	65 nm	—
Architecture	Yonah (2005−2006)	Oakville (2003−2004)
PassMark	405	420+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Solo T1350 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core Solo T1350	Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Socket	PGA478	754
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	—	400
Max RAM Capacity	—	2
RAM Channels	—	1
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core Solo T1350) / false (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ rivals Pentium M 725.