Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 vs Turion 64 MT-28

Intel

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80

1 Cores2 Thrd68 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Turion 64 MT-28

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 vs Turion 64 MT-28 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 vs Turion 64 MT-28 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 vs Turion 64 MT-28: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80

2003

Why buy it

  • Draws 68W instead of 512W, a 444W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (428 vs 445).

Turion 64 MT-28

2005

Why buy it

  • +4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • 652.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 68W.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion 64 MT-28 better than Mobile Pentium 4 2.80?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 MT-28 pulls ahead with 4% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 MT-28 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Turion 64 MT-28 still makes the most sense overall. Turion 64 MT-28 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 4% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Turion 64 MT-28 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 vs Turion 64 MT-28 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80

The Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 428 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Turion 64 MT-28

The Turion 64 MT-28 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 445 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Turion 64 MT-28's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-28 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80. The Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Turion 64 MT-28 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 scores 428 against the Turion 64 MT-28's 445 — a 3.9% lead for the Turion 64 MT-28. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureMobile Pentium 4 2.80Turion 64 MT-28
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+75%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB
Process
130 nm
90 nm-31%
Architecture
Northwood (2002−2004)
Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark
428
445+4%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion 64 MT-28 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureMobile Pentium 4 2.80Turion 64 MT-28
Socket
PGA478
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%