Mobile Sempron M100 vs Celeron 440
Mobile Sempron M100
Celeron 440
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Sempron M100 is positioned at rank 1106 and the Celeron 440 is on rank 1031, so the Celeron 440 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Sempron M100
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 440
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Mobile Sempron M100 | Celeron 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Caspian (2009) / 40 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Conroe-L (2007−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Mobile Sempron M100 | Celeron 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Sempron M100 and Celeron 440
Mobile Sempron M100
The Mobile Sempron M100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: S. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 448 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron 440
The Celeron 440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 472 points. Launch price was $40.
Processing Power
Both the Mobile Sempron M100 and Celeron 440 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Mobile Sempron M100 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron 440 — identical boost frequencies. The Mobile Sempron M100 uses the Caspian (2009) architecture (40 nm), while the Celeron 440 uses Conroe-L (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Sempron M100 scores 448 against the Celeron 440's 472 — a 5.2% lead for the Celeron 440.
| Feature | Mobile Sempron M100 | Celeron 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512 kB |
| Process | 40 nm-38% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Caspian (2009) | Conroe-L (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 448 | 472+5% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 244 |
Memory & Platform
The Mobile Sempron M100 uses the S socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 440 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Mobile Sempron M100 | Celeron 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Mobile Sempron M100) / No (Celeron 440). Primary use case: Celeron 440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 440 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.
| Feature | Mobile Sempron M100 | Celeron 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | No |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Mobile Sempron M100 and Celeron 440
