MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $429 less on MSRP ($20 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1583.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($20 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 8).
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

2008

Why buy it

  • +33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 2145% HIGHER MSRP
    $449 MSRPvs$20 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $20 MSRP).
  • 278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (8 vs 6), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 40nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP makes the most sense to buy today. It is $429 cheaper on MSRP at $20 vs $449, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1583.7% (0.3 vs 0.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 500/FX 600 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP

The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP scores 6 versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 8 — the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 leads by 33.3%. The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) vs 240 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/FX 600).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGPQuadro FX 500/FX 600
G3D Mark Score
6
8+33%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
800+233%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS+80%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
80+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGPQuadro FX 500/FX 600
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 500/FX 600 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 500/FX 600.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGPQuadro FX 500/FX 600
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) vs 350W (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGPQuadro FX 500/FX 600
TDP
50W-74%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP came in at $20, while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 launched at $449. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP was 95.5% cheaper ($429 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) vs 0.0 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) — the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGPQuadro FX 500/FX 600
MSRP
$20-96%
$449
Performance per Dollar
0.3
0.0
Codename
Broadway
GT200B
Release
January 7 2010
November 11 2008
Ranking
#846
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.