CPU
GPU
GeForce4 Ti 4400
Popular choices:
MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is positioned at rank 384 and the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP is on rank 732, so the GeForce4 Ti 4400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 Ti 4400
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2010). The GeForce4 Ti 4400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 16.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP.
| Insight | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+16.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-16.7%) |
| Longevity | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $49 for the GeForce4 Ti 4400, it costs 90% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 740% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+740%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce4 Ti 4400 and MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
GeForce4 Ti 4400
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,599.
MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 Ti 4400 scores 7 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4400 leads by 16.7%. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is built on Ada Lovelace while the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP uses TeraScale 2, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP). Raw compute: 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7+17% | 6 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 16384+1948% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 82.58 TFLOPS+7273% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 176+1000% | 16 |
| TMUs | 512+1180% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 16 MB+19900% | 0.08 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+28700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) — the GeForce4 Ti 4400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+28700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 7.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP). OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1+16% | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 draws 450W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP's 50W — a 160% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 450W | 50W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 216mm | — |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-7% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP launched at $20 and now averages $5. The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP costs 89.8% less ($44 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 1.2 (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) — the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP offers 1100% better value. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $20-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $5-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 1.2+1100% |
| Codename | AD102 | Broadway |
| Release | September 20 2022 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #4 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce4 Ti 4400 and MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
