Mobility Radeon HD 3430 vs GeForce 8300
Mobility Radeon HD 3430
Popular choices:
GeForce 8300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 3430 is positioned at rank 642 and the GeForce 8300 is on rank 640, so the GeForce 8300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3430
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 3430.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 3430 | GeForce 8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 8300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 8300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $49 (vs $50), it costs 2% less, resulting in a 2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 3430 | GeForce 8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 3430 and GeForce 8300
Mobility Radeon HD 3430
The Mobility Radeon HD 3430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.
GeForce 8300
The GeForce 8300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 3430 scores 98 and the GeForce 8300 reaches 102 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 3430 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce 8300 uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3430) vs 256 (GeForce 8300). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3430) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 8300).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3430 | GeForce 8300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 98 | 102+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+213% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS+49% | 0.5888 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+150% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+25% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3430 | GeForce 8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 3430 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8300 has 512 MB. The GeForce 8300 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 3430) vs 1 MB (GeForce 8300) — the GeForce 8300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3430 | GeForce 8300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3430) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8300). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3430 | GeForce 8300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 3430) vs No (GeForce 8300). Decoder: UVD vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 3430) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 8300).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3430 | GeForce 8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo HD | No |
| Decoder | UVD | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 3430 draws 30W versus the GeForce 8300's 33W — a 9.5% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3430 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3430) vs 350W (GeForce 8300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3430 | GeForce 8300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-9% | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.3+6% | 3.1 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 3430 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce 8300 launched at $50 and now averages $50. The Mobility Radeon HD 3430 costs 2% less ($1 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 3430) vs 2.0 (GeForce 8300) — the GeForce 8300 offers 0% better value. The GeForce 8300 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3430 | GeForce 8300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-2% | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-2% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Codename | M98 | GM108 |
| Release | January 9 2009 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #927 | #832 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 3430 and GeForce 8300
