
Mobility Radeon HD 4270 vs Radeon 3000

Mobility Radeon HD 4270
Popular choices:

Radeon 3000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Mobility Radeon HD 4270 is positioned at rank #647 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4270
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 3000 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2009). The Radeon 3000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4270 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 3000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 4270.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 4270 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 3000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $49 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 5.4% better value per dollar than the Mobility Radeon HD 4270.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 4270 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+5.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 4270 and Radeon 3000

Mobility Radeon HD 4270
The Mobility Radeon HD 4270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 93 points.

Radeon 3000
The Radeon 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon HD 4270 scores 93 versus the Radeon 3000's 98 — the Radeon 3000 leads by 5.4%. The Mobility Radeon HD 4270 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon 3000 uses GCN 4.0, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4270) vs 512 (Radeon 3000). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4270) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3000).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4270 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 93 | 98+5% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+56% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS | 1.247 TFLOPS+42% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+25% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4270 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 4270) vs 512 KB (Radeon 3000) — the Radeon 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4270 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4270) vs 10_0 (Radeon 3000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4270 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 4270) vs Avivo HD (Radeon 3000). Decoder: UVD 2 vs Avivo HD.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4270 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo HD | Avivo HD |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | Avivo HD |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 4270 draws 30W versus the Radeon 3000's 50W — a 50% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4270) vs 350W (Radeon 3000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4270 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.1+55% | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 4270 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon 3000 launched at $0 and now averages $49. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.9 (Mobility Radeon HD 4270) vs 2.0 (Radeon 3000) — the Radeon 3000 offers 5.3% better value. The Radeon 3000 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4270 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | 2.0+5% |
| Codename | M98 | Polaris 23 |
| Release | January 9 2009 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #927 | #757 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















