Mobility Radeon HD 4330
VS
GeForce 9500M GS

Mobility Radeon HD 4330 vs GeForce 9500M GS

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4330

2009Core: 550 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 9500M GS

2008Core: 500 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is positioned at rank 599 and the GeForce 9500M GS is on rank 628, so the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4330

#587
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
3934%
#589
3566%
#590
3557%
#594
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3234%
#595
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3212%
#597
GeForce 210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
100%
#598
Mobility Radeon X1900
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
100%
#599
Mobility Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
100%
#600
Radeon R7 M365X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#601
Mobility Radeon HD 5870
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
99%
#602
Radeon R7 M260DX
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#603
Radeon HD 8610G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#604
95%
#605
Radeon HD 4650 AGP
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
94%
#606
GeForce 9800M GS
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
94%
#607
Radeon R7 M270
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
93%
#608
GeForce 9800 GTX
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
93%
#609
Mobility Radeon HD 5850
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
92%
#610
92%
#612
GeForce 205
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9500M GS

#618
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
4891%
#620
4433%
#621
4422%
#625
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
4021%
#626
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3993%
#628
GeForce 9500M GS
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
100%
#629
GeForce 8800 GS
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
99%
#631
GeForce 9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $50
96%
#632
Mobility Radeon X1700
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
96%
#633
Mobility Radeon HD 560v
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
95%
#634
GeForce 9300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
95%
#635
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
MSRP: $899|Avg: $400
95%
#636
GeForce 8400M G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
95%
#637
GeForce 8400M GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
94%
#638
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
94%
#639
GeForce 9100
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
92%
#640
GeForce 8300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
92%
#641
GeForce 9600M GT
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
92%
#642
Mobility Radeon HD 3430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
90%
#643
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9500M GS.

InsightMobility Radeon HD 4330GeForce 9500M GS
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 9500M GS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9500M GS holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $49), it costs 69% less, resulting in a 221.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightMobility Radeon HD 4330GeForce 9500M GS
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+221.8%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 4330 and GeForce 9500M GS

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4330

The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 135 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9500M GS

The GeForce 9500M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 133 points.

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 scores 135 and the GeForce 9500M GS reaches 133 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce 9500M GS uses G9x, both on 55 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330) vs 224 (GeForce 9500M GS).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4330GeForce 9500M GS
G3D Mark Score
135+2%
133
Architecture
TeraScale
G9x
Process Node
55 nm
65 nm
Shading Units
800+257%
224

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4330GeForce 9500M GS
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4330GeForce 9500M GS
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9500M GS). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4330GeForce 9500M GS
DirectX
10.1
10.0
Vulkan
N/A
None
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD2 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330) vs No (GeForce 9500M GS). Decoder: UVD2 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 9500M GS).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4330GeForce 9500M GS
Encoder
UVD2
No
Decoder
UVD2
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4
MPEG-2,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 draws 30W versus the GeForce 9500M GS's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4330) vs 350W (GeForce 9500M GS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4330GeForce 9500M GS
TDP
30W-80%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
4.5+400%
0.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce 9500M GS launched at $60 and now averages $15. The GeForce 9500M GS costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.8 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330) vs 8.9 (GeForce 9500M GS) — the GeForce 9500M GS offers 217.9% better value. The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is the newer GPU (2009 vs 2008).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4330GeForce 9500M GS
MSRP
$49-18%
$60
Avg Price (30d)
$49
$15-69%
Performance per Dollar
2.8
8.9+218%
Codename
M98
NB9E-GTX
Release
January 9 2009
July 15 2008
Ranking
#927
#825