Mobility Radeon HD 4330 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Mobility Radeon HD 4330
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is positioned at rank 599 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is on rank 593, so the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4330
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 4330.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 4330 | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $49), it costs 69% less, resulting in a 238.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 4330 | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+238.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 4330 and Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Mobility Radeon HD 4330
The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 135 points.
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 140 points.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 scores 135 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 reaches 140 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is built on TeraScale while the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3650). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4330) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3650).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4330 | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 135 | 140+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+27% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+100% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4330 | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 has 1 GB. The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4330 | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4330 | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD2 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330) vs UVD (Mobility Radeon HD 3650). Decoder: UVD2 vs UVD.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4330 | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD2 | UVD |
| Decoder | UVD2 | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 draws 30W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3650's 50W — a 50% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4330) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4330 | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.5+61% | 2.8 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 launched at $49 and now averages $15. The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.8 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330) vs 9.3 (Mobility Radeon HD 3650) — the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 offers 232.1% better value. The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4330 | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | $49 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $15-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.8 | 9.3+232% |
| Codename | M98 | Broadway |
| Release | January 9 2009 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #927 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 4330 and Mobility Radeon HD 3650
