
Mobility Radeon HD 4350 vs Quadro FX 380 LP

Mobility Radeon HD 4350
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 380 LP
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 4350 is positioned at rank 588 and the Quadro FX 380 LP is on rank 362, so the Quadro FX 380 LP offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4350
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 380 LP
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon HD 4350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 380 LP.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 4350 | Quadro FX 380 LP |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 4350 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 4350 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $15), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 4350 | Quadro FX 380 LP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 4350 and Quadro FX 380 LP

Mobility Radeon HD 4350
The Mobility Radeon HD 4350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points.

Quadro FX 380 LP
The Quadro FX 380 LP is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 4350 scores 148 and the Quadro FX 380 LP reaches 145 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4350 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 380 LP uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4350) vs 240 (Quadro FX 380 LP). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4350) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380 LP).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4350 | Quadro FX 380 LP |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 148+2% | 145 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+233% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS+80% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4350 | Quadro FX 380 LP |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4350 | Quadro FX 380 LP |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 4350 draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 380 LP's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4350) vs 350W (Quadro FX 380 LP). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4350 | Quadro FX 380 LP |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-74% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 3.0+275% | 0.8 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 4350 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Quadro FX 380 LP launched at $169 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.9 (Mobility Radeon HD 4350) vs 9.7 (Quadro FX 380 LP) — the Mobility Radeon HD 4350 offers 2.1% better value. The Mobility Radeon HD 4350 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4350 | Quadro FX 380 LP |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-70% | $169 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.9+2% | 9.7 |
| Codename | Broadway | GT200B |
| Release | January 7 2010 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #846 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















