
Mobility Radeon HD 4650

RADEON E4690
Mobility Radeon HD 4650 vs RADEON E4690 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Mobility Radeon HD 4650 vs RADEON E4690 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Mobility Radeon HD 4650 vs RADEON E4690: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
2010Why buy it
- β Costs $509 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $558 MSRP).
- β Delivers 1027.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $558 MSRP).
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- β Draws 50W instead of 95W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
RADEON E4690
2015Why buy it
- β More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014β2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β1038.8% HIGHER MSRP$558 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($558 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- β90% higher power demand at 95W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 4650 vs RADEON E4690 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 4650
The Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 401 points.

RADEON E4690
The RADEON E4690 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 405 points.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 4650 scores 401 and the RADEON E4690 reaches 405 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON E4690 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4650) vs 2,048 (RADEON E4690). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4650) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON E4690).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | RADEON E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 401 | 405 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2048+156% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS+266% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 512 KB+540% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | RADEON E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 4650 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON E4690 carries 512 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 4650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4650 and 64-bit on the RADEON E4690. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 4650) vs 512 KB (RADEON E4690) β the RADEON E4690 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | RADEON E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 4650 draws 50W versus the RADEON E4690's 95W β a 62.1% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4650) vs 350W (RADEON E4690). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | RADEON E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-47% | 95W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | β |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 8.0+86% | 4.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 4650 came in at $49, while the RADEON E4690 launched at $558. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 4650 was 91.2% cheaper ($509 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.2 (Mobility Radeon HD 4650) vs 0.7 (RADEON E4690) β the Mobility Radeon HD 4650 offers 1071.4% better value. The newer card here is RADEON E4690 (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | RADEON E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-91% | $558 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2+1071% | 0.7 |
| Codename | Broadway | Amethyst |
| Release | January 7 2010 | September 29 2015 |
| Ranking | #846 | #420 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














