GeForce 810M vs Mobility Radeon HD 4650

GeForce 810M

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz

Mobility Radeon HD 4650

2010Core: 700 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce 810M

420

+4.7%

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile

Mobility Radeon HD 4650

401

0.0%

Radeon HD 7450

Radeon HD 5470

Radeon HD 2900 GT

Mobility Radeon HD 565v

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 810M is positioned at rank 317 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is on rank 398, so the GeForce 810M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 810M

#63

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600

100%

#307

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

776%

#309

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

703%

#310

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

701%

#314

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

638%

#315

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

633%

#317

GeForce 810M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#320

GeForce 940A

MSRP: $80|Avg: $80

99%

#323

Radeon RX 640

MSRP: $159|Avg: $55

98%

#326

Iris Pro Graphics P580

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

97%

#327

Radeon E8870PCIe

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

96%

#330

Arc Graphics 140T

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

92%

#331

Radeon 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4650

#388

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1327%

#390

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1203%

#391

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1200%

#395

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1091%

#396

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1084%

#398

Mobility Radeon HD 4650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

100%

#399

Radeon R9 M290X

MSRP: $400|Avg: $60

98%

#401

Radeon HD 7670

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

98%

#402

Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

97%

#403

Mobility Radeon HD 5000

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

95%

#404

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

95%

#406

Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

95%

#407

Radeon HD 8650G + 7700M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

92%

#408

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

92%

#409

GeForce GTX 285M SLI

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

90%

#410

Radeon R7 M260X

MSRP: $139|Avg: $35

89%

#411

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6570 Dual

MSRP: $120|Avg: $25

88%

#412

Intel UHD Graphics 615

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

88%

#413

Radeon R7 A365

MSRP: $109|Avg: $55

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 810M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Mobility Radeon HD 4650 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce 810M	Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+4.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 810M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 810M Benchmark Check

Mobility Radeon HD 4650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 810M and Mobility Radeon HD 4650

GeForce 810M

The GeForce 810M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 420 points.

Mobility Radeon HD 4650

The Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 401 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 810M scores 420 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4650 reaches 401 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 810M is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 4650 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 810M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4650). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 810M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4650).

Feature	GeForce 810M	Mobility Radeon HD 4650
G3D Mark Score	420+5%	401
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS	1.12 TFLOPS+30%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	16	40+150%
L1 Cache	192 KB+140%	80 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 810M	Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 810M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4650 has 1 GB. The Mobility Radeon HD 4650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 810M) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 4650) — the GeForce 810M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 810M	Mobility Radeon HD 4650
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 810M) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 810M	Mobility Radeon HD 4650
DirectX	12 (11_0)+19%	10.1
Vulkan	1.2	N/A
OpenGL	4.6+39%	3.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce 810M) vs None (Mobility Radeon HD 4650). Decoder: NVDEC vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 810M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 4650).

Feature	GeForce 810M	Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	None
Decoder	NVDEC	UVD 2.2
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 810M draws 33W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4650's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 810M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 810M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4650). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80.