Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs Quadro 600

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4830

2009Core: 550 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 600

2017Core: 1430 MHzBoost: 1620 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs Quadro 600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs Quadro 600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 4830

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $49 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
  • Delivers 35.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.9 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 40W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2009 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro 600

2017

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 37.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $179 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 3.9 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 40W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro 600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (522 vs 512), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 4830 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 cheaper on MSRP at $130 vs $179, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 35.1% (3.9 vs 2.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro 600 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs Quadro 600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4830

The Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 512 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 600

The Quadro 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 522 points. Launch price was $178.

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 4830 scores 512 and the Quadro 600 reaches 522 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is built on TeraScale while the Quadro 600 uses Pascal, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4830) vs 384 (Quadro 600). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4830) vs 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro 600).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4830Quadro 600
G3D Mark Score
512
522+2%
Architecture
TeraScale
Pascal
Process Node
55 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
800+108%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.88 TFLOPS
1.244 TFLOPS+41%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40+67%
24
L1 Cache
160 KB+11%
144 KB
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4830Quadro 600
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4830 and 64-bit on the Quadro 600. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 4830) vs 1 MB (Quadro 600) — the Quadro 600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4830Quadro 600
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 4830 draws 30W versus the Quadro 600's 40W — a 28.6% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4830) vs 350W (Quadro 600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4830Quadro 600
TDP
30W-25%
40W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
17.1+31%
13.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 4830 came in at $130, while the Quadro 600 launched at $179. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 4830 was 27.4% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.9 (Mobility Radeon HD 4830) vs 2.9 (Quadro 600) — the Mobility Radeon HD 4830 offers 34.5% better value. The newer card here is Quadro 600 (2017 vs 2009).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4830Quadro 600
MSRP
$130-27%
$179
Performance per Dollar
3.9+34%
2.9
Codename
M98
GP107
Release
January 9 2009
February 7 2017
Ranking
#927
#558

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.