Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs GRID M10-0B
Mobility Radeon HD 4850
Popular choices:
GRID M10-0B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is positioned at rank 504 and the GRID M10-0B is on rank 403, so the GRID M10-0B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4850
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-0B
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GRID M10-0B is significantly newer (2016 vs 2009). The GRID M10-0B likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M10-0B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $1,000), it costs 98% less, resulting in a 4871.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4871.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 and GRID M10-0B
Mobility Radeon HD 4850
The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 866 points.
GRID M10-0B
The GRID M10-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 871 points.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 scores 866 and the GRID M10-0B reaches 871 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is built on TeraScale while the GRID M10-0B uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4850) vs 640 (GRID M10-0B). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4850) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0B).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 866 | 871 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+25% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS | 1.672 TFLOPS+90% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 320 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-0B has 512 MB. The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 4850) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-0B) — the GRID M10-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 draws 30W versus the GRID M10-0B's 225W — a 152.9% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4850) vs 350W (GRID M10-0B). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-87% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 28.9+641% | 3.9 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GRID M10-0B launched at $4000 and now averages $1000. The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 costs 98% less ($980 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 43.3 (Mobility Radeon HD 4850) vs 0.9 (GRID M10-0B) — the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 offers 4711.1% better value. The GRID M10-0B is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-95% | $4000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-98% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.3+4711% | 0.9 |
| Codename | M98 | GM107 |
| Release | January 9 2009 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #927 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 4850 and GRID M10-0B
