Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs Radeon 520

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4850

2009Core: 550 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon 520

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs Radeon 520 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs Radeon 520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 4850

2009

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2009 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 155.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $199 MSRPvs$78 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.4 vs 11.2 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $78 MSRP).

Radeon 520

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $121 less on MSRP ($78 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 157.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.2 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($78 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 520 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (874 vs 866), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 520 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $121 cheaper on MSRP at $78 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 157.5% (11.2 vs 4.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon 520 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Mobility Radeon HD 4850 has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs Radeon 520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4850

The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 866 points.

AMD

Radeon 520

The Radeon 520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 874 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 scores 866 and the Radeon 520 reaches 874 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon 520 uses GCN 4.0, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4850) vs 512 (Radeon 520). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4850) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 520).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4850Radeon 520
G3D Mark Score
866
874
Architecture
TeraScale
GCN 4.0
Process Node
55 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
800+56%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.88 TFLOPS
1.211 TFLOPS+38%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40+25%
32
L1 Cache
160 KB+25%
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4850Radeon 520
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 520 carries 512 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 4850 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 and 64-bit on the Radeon 520.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4850Radeon 520
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 draws 30W versus the Radeon 520's 50W — a 50% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4850) vs 250W (Radeon 520). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4850Radeon 520
TDP
30W-40%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
250W-29%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
95
Perf/Watt
28.9+65%
17.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 came in at $199, while the Radeon 520 launched at $78. On MSRP, Radeon 520 was 60.8% cheaper ($121 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.4 (Mobility Radeon HD 4850) vs 11.2 (Radeon 520) — the Radeon 520 offers 154.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 520 (2017 vs 2009).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4850Radeon 520
MSRP
$199
$78-61%
Performance per Dollar
4.4
11.2+155%
Codename
M98
Lexa
Release
January 9 2009
April 20 2017
Ranking
#927
#668

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.