HD Graphics 6000 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850

HD Graphics 6000

2014Core: 300 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4850

2009Core: 550 MHz
Similar parts
·······

HD Graphics 6000 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

HD Graphics 6000 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

HD Graphics 6000

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 30W, a 15W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Mobility Radeon HD 4850

2009

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
  • HD Graphics 6000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2009 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100% higher power demand at 30W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
HD Graphics 6000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (873 vs 866), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 4850 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. HD Graphics 6000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

HD Graphics 6000 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

HD Graphics 6000

The HD Graphics 6000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 873 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4850

The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 866 points.

Graphics Performance

The HD Graphics 6000 scores 873 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 reaches 866 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 6000 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (HD Graphics 6000) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4850). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 6000) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4850).

FeatureHD Graphics 6000Mobility Radeon HD 4850
G3D Mark Score
873
866
Architecture
Generation 8.0
TeraScale
Process Node
14 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7296 TFLOPS
0.88 TFLOPS+21%
ROPs
6
16+167%
TMUs
48+20%
40

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureHD Graphics 6000Mobility Radeon HD 4850
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The HD Graphics 6000 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 carries 1 GB. Mobility Radeon HD 4850 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the HD Graphics 6000 and 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4850.

FeatureHD Graphics 6000Mobility Radeon HD 4850
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
1 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The HD Graphics 6000 draws 15W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4850's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The HD Graphics 6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 6000) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4850). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureHD Graphics 6000Mobility Radeon HD 4850
TDP
15W-50%
30W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
95
Perf/Watt
58.2+101%
28.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the HD Graphics 6000 came in at $0, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 launched at $199. On MSRP, HD Graphics 6000 was 100+% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (HD Graphics 6000) vs 4.4 (Mobility Radeon HD 4850) — the HD Graphics 6000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is HD Graphics 6000 (2014 vs 2009).

FeatureHD Graphics 6000Mobility Radeon HD 4850
MSRP
$0-100%
$199
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
4.4
Codename
Broadwell GT3
M98
Release
September 5 2014
January 9 2009
Ranking
#924
#927

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.