HD Graphics 6000 vs Iris Graphics 6100
HD Graphics 6000
Popular choices:
Iris Graphics 6100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Graphics 6100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the HD Graphics 6000.
| Insight | HD Graphics 6000 | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Graphics 6100 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics 6000 and Iris Graphics 6100
HD Graphics 6000
The HD Graphics 6000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 873 points.
Iris Graphics 6100
The Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 899 points.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics 6000 scores 873 and the Iris Graphics 6100 reaches 899 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 6000 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Iris Graphics 6100 uses Generation 8.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (HD Graphics 6000) vs 384 (Iris Graphics 6100). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 6000) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 6100). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | HD Graphics 6000 | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 873 | 899+3% |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7296 TFLOPS | 0.768 TFLOPS+5% |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1000 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 6 | 6 |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics 6000 | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | HD Graphics 6000 | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics 6000 draws 15W versus the Iris Graphics 6100's 15W — a 0% difference. The Iris Graphics 6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 6000) vs 1W (Iris Graphics 6100). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | HD Graphics 6000 | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 58.2 | 59.9+3% |
Value Analysis
The HD Graphics 6000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Iris Graphics 6100 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Iris Graphics 6100 costs 100+% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 87.3 (HD Graphics 6000) vs Infinity (Iris Graphics 6100) — the Iris Graphics 6100 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Graphics 6100 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | HD Graphics 6000 | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 87.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3 | Broadwell GT3 |
| Release | September 5 2014 | January 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #924 | #913 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on HD Graphics 6000 and Iris Graphics 6100
