HD Graphics 6000 vs Radeon 520

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

HD Graphics 6000 vs Radeon 520 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

HD Graphics 6000 vs Radeon 520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

HD Graphics 6000

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $78 MSRP).

Radeon 520

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($78 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅HD Graphics 6000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 520 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 520 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (874 vs 873), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 520 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 520 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

HD Graphics 6000 vs Radeon 520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

HD Graphics 6000

The HD Graphics 6000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 873 points.

Radeon 520

The Radeon 520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 874 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The HD Graphics 6000 scores 873 and the Radeon 520 reaches 874 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 6000 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon 520 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (HD Graphics 6000) vs 512 (Radeon 520). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 6000) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 520). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1183 MHz.

Feature	HD Graphics 6000	Radeon 520
G3D Mark Score	873	874
Architecture	Generation 8.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7296 TFLOPS	1.211 TFLOPS+66%
Boost Clock	950 MHz	1183 MHz+25%
ROPs	6	16+167%
TMUs	48+50%	32

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	HD Graphics 6000	Radeon 520
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The HD Graphics 6000 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 520 carries 512 MB. Radeon 520 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the HD Graphics 6000 and 64-bit on the Radeon 520.

Feature	HD Graphics 6000	Radeon 520
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The HD Graphics 6000 draws 15W versus the Radeon 520's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The HD Graphics 6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 6000) vs 250W (Radeon 520). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

Feature	HD Graphics 6000	Radeon 520
TDP	15W-70%	50W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	250W
Power Connector	Integrated	None
Perf/Watt	58.2+233%	17.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the HD Graphics 6000 came in at $0, while the Radeon 520 launched at $78. On MSRP, HD Graphics 6000 was 100+% cheaper ($78 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (HD Graphics 6000) vs 11.2 (Radeon 520) — the HD Graphics 6000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 520 (2017 vs 2014).

Feature	HD Graphics 6000	Radeon 520
MSRP	$0-100%	$78
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	11.2
Codename	Broadwell GT3	Lexa
Release	September 5 2014	April 20 2017
Ranking	#924	#668

Search HD Graphics 6000 on Amazon

Search Radeon 520 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.