HD Graphics 520
VS
Mobility Radeon HD 4850

HD Graphics 520 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850

HD Graphics 520

2015Core: 300 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4850

2009Core: 550 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The HD Graphics 520 is positioned at rank 389 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is on rank 504, so the HD Graphics 520 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar HD Graphics 520

#379
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1261%
#381
1143%
#382
1140%
#386
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1037%
#387
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1030%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
100%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
100%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
99%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
98%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
98%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
97%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
96%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
96%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
95%
#400
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
93%
#401
Radeon HD 7670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
93%
#402
Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
92%
#403
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
91%
#404
Mobility Radeon HD 5000
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4850

#493
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2496%
#495
2263%
#496
2257%
#500
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2052%
#501
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2038%
#503
GeForce 800A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
100%
#504
Mobility Radeon HD 4850
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
100%
#505
100%
#506
99%
#507
Radeon R7 M460
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#508
Mobility Radeon HD 3870
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
98%
#509
GeForce 9800 S
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
97%
#510
97%
#511
Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#512
97%
#513
Radeon HD 7660D
MSRP: $122|Avg: $15
97%
#514
Radeon HD 8650G + 8500M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
96%
#515
95%
#516
GeForce 8200
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
94%
#517
Mobility Radeon HD 545v
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
94%
#518
GeForce 9500M G
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The HD Graphics 520 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The HD Graphics 520 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the HD Graphics 520.

InsightHD Graphics 520Mobility Radeon HD 4850
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $35), it costs 43% less, resulting in a 76% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightHD Graphics 520Mobility Radeon HD 4850
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+76%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($35)
More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics 520 and Mobility Radeon HD 4850

Intel

HD Graphics 520

The HD Graphics 520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 861 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4850

The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 866 points.

Graphics Performance

The HD Graphics 520 scores 861 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 reaches 866 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 520 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm+ vs 55 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 520) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4850). Raw compute: 0.3456 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 520) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4850).

FeatureHD Graphics 520Mobility Radeon HD 4850
G3D Mark Score
861
866
Architecture
Generation 9.0
TeraScale
Process Node
14 nm+
55 nm
Shading Units
192
800+317%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.3456 TFLOPS
0.88 TFLOPS+155%
ROPs
3
16+433%
TMUs
24
40+67%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureHD Graphics 520Mobility Radeon HD 4850
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The HD Graphics 520 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 has 1 GB. The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

FeatureHD Graphics 520Mobility Radeon HD 4850
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
1 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The HD Graphics 520 draws 15W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4850's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The HD Graphics 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 520) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4850). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureHD Graphics 520Mobility Radeon HD 4850
TDP
15W-50%
30W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
95
Perf/Watt
57.4+99%
28.9
💰

Value Analysis

The HD Graphics 520 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 launched at $199 and now averages $20. The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 costs 42.9% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.6 (HD Graphics 520) vs 43.3 (Mobility Radeon HD 4850) — the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 offers 76% better value. The HD Graphics 520 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).

FeatureHD Graphics 520Mobility Radeon HD 4850
MSRP
$100-50%
$199
Avg Price (30d)
$35
$20-43%
Performance per Dollar
24.6
43.3+76%
Codename
Skylake GT2
M98
Release
September 1 2015
January 9 2009
Ranking
#929
#927