
FirePro W2100

HD Graphics 520
FirePro W2100 vs HD Graphics 520 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W2100 vs HD Graphics 520 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W2100 vs HD Graphics 520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W2100
2014Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅HD Graphics 520 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro W2100 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌39% HIGHER MSRP$139 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌73.3% higher power demand at 26W vs 15W.
HD Graphics 520
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $39 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 26W, a 11W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W2100 vs HD Graphics 520 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W2100
The FirePro W2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 680 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 26W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 851 points.

HD Graphics 520
The HD Graphics 520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 861 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W2100 scores 851 and the HD Graphics 520 reaches 861 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W2100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the HD Graphics 520 uses Generation 9.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 320 (FirePro W2100) vs 192 (HD Graphics 520). Raw compute: 0.4352 TFLOPS (FirePro W2100) vs 0.3456 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 520). Boost clocks: 680 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 851 | 861+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 320+67% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4352 TFLOPS+26% | 0.3456 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 680 MHz | 900 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 8+167% | 3 |
| TMUs | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W2100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the HD Graphics 520 carries 0 MB. FirePro W2100 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W2100 and System on the HD Graphics 520.
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W2100 draws 26W versus the HD Graphics 520's 15W — a 53.7% difference. The HD Graphics 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W2100) vs 1W (HD Graphics 520). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 26W | 15W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.7 | 57.4+76% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W2100 came in at $139, while the HD Graphics 520 launched at $100. On MSRP, HD Graphics 520 was 28.1% cheaper ($39 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (FirePro W2100) vs 8.6 (HD Graphics 520) — the HD Graphics 520 offers 41% better value. The newer card here is HD Graphics 520 (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $139 | $100-28% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 8.6+41% |
| Codename | Oland | Skylake GT2 |
| Release | August 12 2014 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #910 | #929 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













