FirePro W2100 vs Radeon R7 A10-8750

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W2100 is positioned at rank 190 and the Radeon R7 A10-8750 is on rank 281, so the FirePro W2100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W2100

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

99%

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

98%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

96%

#86

Radeon Pro WX 9100

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550

91%

#87

A10G

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000

89%

#88

Tesla T4

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000

88%

#89

Tesla M40 24GB

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120

87%

#175

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2414%

#190

FirePro W2100

MSRP: $139|Avg: $30

100%

#191

CMP 30HX

MSRP: $799|Avg: $60

100%

#193

FirePro M6000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

99%

#196

FirePro M4170

MSRP: $200|Avg: $80

95%

#197

GRID K140Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $500

95%

#200

Radeon Pro Duo

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $799

91%

#201

P102-100

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

90%

#203

Quadro FX 2700

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A10-8750

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

2121%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

2038%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

2014%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

2011%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

2006%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

1995%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

1970%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1963%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1944%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

1939%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

1916%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1912%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

1877%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1876%

#266

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

2339%

#281

Radeon R7 A10-8750

MSRP: $250|Avg: $30

100%

#282

Radeon HD 6410D

MSRP: $70|Avg: $70

99%

#283

Radeon HD 3850 AGP

MSRP: $130|Avg: $130

97%

#285

Radeon R9 M280X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $50

95%

#286

Radeon HD 5470

MSRP: $83|Avg: $83

94%

#287

GeForce GT 220

MSRP: $69|Avg: $49

94%

#288

Radeon R7 A10-8850

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

90%

#290

GeForce G210

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

87%

#291

Radeon HD 4850 X2

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

83%

#292

Radeon HD 4330

MSRP: $50|Avg: $9

79%

#293

GeForce GTX 260

MSRP: $449|Avg: $449

78%

#294

Radeon HD 8490

MSRP: $99|Avg: $35

78%

#295

Radeon HD 8650D

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

77%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W2100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	FirePro W2100	Radeon R7 A10-8750
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+300%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 A10-8750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $30), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	FirePro W2100	Radeon R7 A10-8750
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+0.6%)
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro W2100 Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 A10-8750 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W2100 and Radeon R7 A10-8750

FirePro W2100

The FirePro W2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 680 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 26W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 851 points.

Radeon R7 A10-8750

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 856 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W2100 scores 851 and the Radeon R7 A10-8750 reaches 856 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W2100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 A10-8750 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (FirePro W2100) vs 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8750). Raw compute: 0.4352 TFLOPS (FirePro W2100) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8750).

Feature	FirePro W2100	Radeon R7 A10-8750
G3D Mark Score	851	856
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	320	512+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4352 TFLOPS	0.8192 TFLOPS+88%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	20	32+60%
L1 Cache	80 KB	128 KB+60%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W2100	Radeon R7 A10-8750
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W2100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A10-8750 has 512 MB. The FirePro W2100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	FirePro W2100	Radeon R7 A10-8750
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W2100 draws 26W versus the Radeon R7 A10-8750's 55W — a 71.6% difference. The FirePro W2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W2100) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	FirePro W2100	Radeon R7 A10-8750
TDP	26W-53%	55W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	32.7+110%	15.6

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro W2100 launched at $139 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon R7 A10-8750 launched at $250 and now averages $30. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.4 (FirePro W2100) vs 28.5 (Radeon R7 A10-8750) — the Radeon R7 A10-8750 offers 0.4% better value. The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).