
FirePro W2100 vs GRID M10-0B

FirePro W2100
Popular choices:

GRID M10-0B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W2100 is positioned at rank 190 and the GRID M10-0B is on rank 403, so the FirePro W2100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W2100
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-0B
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M10-0B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W2100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro W2100 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W2100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W2100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $1,000), it costs 97% less, resulting in a 3156.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W2100 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3156.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W2100 and GRID M10-0B

FirePro W2100
The FirePro W2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 680 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 26W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 851 points.

GRID M10-0B
The GRID M10-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 871 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W2100 scores 851 and the GRID M10-0B reaches 871 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W2100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID M10-0B uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (FirePro W2100) vs 640 (GRID M10-0B). Raw compute: 0.4352 TFLOPS (FirePro W2100) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0B). Boost clocks: 680 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 851 | 871+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 640+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4352 TFLOPS | 1.672 TFLOPS+284% |
| Boost Clock | 680 MHz | 1306 MHz+92% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 20 | 40+100% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 320 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W2100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-0B has 512 MB. The FirePro W2100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro W2100) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-0B) — the GRID M10-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W2100 draws 26W versus the GRID M10-0B's 225W — a 158.6% difference. The FirePro W2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W2100) vs 350W (GRID M10-0B). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 26W-88% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.7+738% | 3.9 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W2100 launched at $139 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GRID M10-0B launched at $4000 and now averages $1000. The FirePro W2100 costs 97% less ($970 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.4 (FirePro W2100) vs 0.9 (GRID M10-0B) — the FirePro W2100 offers 3055.6% better value. The GRID M10-0B is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $139-97% | $4000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-97% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.4+3056% | 0.9 |
| Codename | Oland | GM107 |
| Release | August 12 2014 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #910 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














