
FirePro 3D V4800

FirePro W2100
FirePro 3D V4800 vs FirePro W2100 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 3D V4800 vs FirePro W2100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 3D V4800 vs FirePro W2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 3D V4800
2010Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌36% HIGHER MSRP$189 MSRPvs$139 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.5 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($189 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
- ❌184.6% higher power demand at 74W vs 26W.
FirePro W2100
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 35.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 4.5 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 26W instead of 74W, a 48W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V4800 vs FirePro W2100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V4800
The FirePro 3D V4800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 854 points. Launch price was $479.

FirePro W2100
The FirePro W2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 680 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 26W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 851 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V4800 scores 854 and the FirePro W2100 reaches 851 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V4800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the FirePro W2100 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 320 (FirePro W2100). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 0.4352 TFLOPS (FirePro W2100).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | FirePro W2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 854 | 851 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+150% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS+154% | 0.4352 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+100% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | FirePro W2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V4800 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W2100 carries 2 GB. FirePro W2100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V4800 and 64-bit on the FirePro W2100.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | FirePro W2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 12 (FirePro W2100). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | FirePro W2100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12+7% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W2100). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W2100).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | FirePro W2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.3 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V4800 draws 74W versus the FirePro W2100's 26W — a 96% difference. The FirePro W2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 350W (FirePro W2100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | FirePro W2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W | 26W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | 69mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 11.5 | 32.7+184% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 3D V4800 came in at $189, while the FirePro W2100 launched at $139. On MSRP, FirePro W2100 was 26.5% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.5 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 6.1 (FirePro W2100) — the FirePro W2100 offers 35.6% better value. The newer card here is FirePro W2100 (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | FirePro W2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $189 | $139-26% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.5 | 6.1+36% |
| Codename | Juniper | Oland |
| Release | April 26 2010 | August 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #780 | #910 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













